Also made me realize my gummy eraser is so used up it's more of a smudging device now. Time to buy a new one.




An ongoing account of my love of art, drawing, and all things in-between.


I have a terrible habit of leaving artwork at not quite "finished." So in an attempt to fix this, I'm going to be trying out a new thing to bring together my drawing and painting styles. The sketch is a rough concept I'm using for this experiment.
Tree Lady makes a return... and appears to be growing. 
There are days when I just need to take time off. No errands, no tasks, no demands.


Contrasts are some of my favorite things. Gears within a clock. Songs without lyrics. Milk in coffee. 
This curling, almost feather-like design is central to most traditional Buddhist Thai art and used on houses, temples, and decorative work. It can symbolize two things depending on form and context: Kranok - the cleansing flame of Buddhism, or Kanok - humanity's flame of impulsiveness and passion, which can be quelled by Buddhist teachings to reach enlightenment.


As usual, the whole "But is it art?" debate crops up among critics and scholars. I'll keep my thoughts on that long-running issue to another post, but in Varini's particular case, I'd say the he's putting a twist or even reversal of the traditional trompe-l'œil. Instead of 3D illusion on a 2D plane, it's a 2D illusion on a 3D environment. Especially in this time of computers and digital art, when his work is viewed on the internet, the initial reaction is usually a disbelieving "Why is that photoshopped on there?"
Tree Lady's general posture stays the same, though a little less painful-looking each time. Never seems to open her eyes though. I think this was a plan for a clock I was going to make. I have a secret love for mechanical bits and pieces, so there was going to be moving gears and whatnot behind her. But then I just started rolling with her design and started making it into a drawing instead. Here's a more recent incarnation:
She's very unfinished here (note the classy lined paper) but I like the direction it's going in. I think I stopped short because of the realization that I wanted to put her in a more formal media like ink or watercolor. Or would that defeat the purpose of changing her a bit every time I depict her? Setting her in ink might make that particular design canon and that seems silly to do to her. The use of pencil is so casual to me that I don't have to worry about presentation or what is canon for her design. For instance, here she started sprouting another pair of arms. And her usual straight hair has picked up wind somewhere. Will she have legs next perhaps?
This is when I'd usually wax philosophical, but due to a mixture of cold remedies and general laziness, the only thought that pops up is,
A kinnari/kinnaree/kinnara is mythical creature with the top half of a human, usually a woman, and lower half of a bird (often cited as "swan" in English-translated literature but pictorial evidence suggests otherwise) They describe themselves as thus:

I was once told that I draw like a conductor.
"Look at that line. It is the line of enlightenment. There is only one line like that in the universe, and it will never be made again. You cannot think to make such a line and succeed; it must come from having no limits to your action of painting the line."

